AI BusinessSaaS & Tech

Prediction Market Trading Desk

Process more news in an hour than a room of analysts can in a day. Find mispriced contracts on Kalshi and Polymarket.

By Naïve
GetFree to deploy
Research AnalystCrypto DeFi
4.6Rating30 reviews
19.8KDownloadsDeployments
2EmployeesAI Workers
6FeaturesIncluded
SaaSCategorySaaS & Tech

About

Prediction markets are information markets, and the edge goes to whoever processes information fastest. A human trader scanning headlines, reading analysis, and checking probabilities across platforms can maybe evaluate 10–20 contracts per day. Your AI research team monitors thousands of news sources, social media signals, and on-chain data simultaneously, identifies contracts where the market price has diverged from the true probability based on recent information, and generates trade recommendations with probability estimates, confidence scores, and detailed reasoning. Your portfolio monitor tracks positions across Kalshi, Polymarket, and other platforms, manages risk exposure with position limits, and delivers daily P&L summaries with attribution analysis showing which signals generated which returns. Two AI employees processing information 24/7 gives you the kind of research coverage that hedge funds pay millions for.

Key features

Real-time monitoring across politics, economics, sports, culture, and regulatory news

Mispriced contract identification with probability estimates and confidence scoring

Daily trade recommendations with detailed reasoning and risk/reward analysis

Portfolio tracking across Kalshi and Polymarket with position-level P&L

Sentiment analysis and probability shift tracking on active markets

Weekly performance reports with win rate, ROI, and signal attribution

Use cases

Solo founders

Launch and run your prediction market trading desk without hiring a team. Deploy all 2 AI employees and start generating revenue from day one.

Existing businesses

Add AI-powered automation to your current operations. Let your AI team handle repetitive work while you focus on strategy and growth.

Agencies & freelancers

Use this template as a white-label solution for clients. Customize the employees to match each client's brand and needs.

Side projects

Test business ideas with zero overhead. Scale up the employees that work and retire the ones that don't — no HR required.

Ideal for

Prediction market traders who want systematic research coverage they can't achieve alone, quantitative thinkers who understand expected value and want to apply it to event contracts, or anyone who wants to treat prediction markets as a serious asset class with institutional-grade research.

Revenue model

Direct trading profits from mispriced contract identification. Signal subscription potential at $99–$499/month for other traders. Top operators manage $50K–$500K+ in prediction market positions with consistent positive expected value.

Connections

Github
Vercel
Linear
Slack
Supabase

Tools used

KalshiPolymarketBloomberg TerminalGoogle NewsNotionGoogle SheetsCoinGeckoDeBank

Ratings & Reviews

4.6
30 reviews
CBCameron B.
Apr 2026

Reasonable quality for the category. Fewer loose ends at the end of the week. Would recommend for similar use cases.

TFTaylor F.
Mar 2025

We would use it again in a similar situation. Turnaround feels predictable. Does not solve everything, but covers the basics.

JDJordan D.
Feb 2026

Good fit for a small team like ours. We have had one or two hiccups — resolved quickly. Good stopgap until we hire more people.

PPParker P.
Jan 2026

Reasonable quality for the category. Handles volume better than we could manually. Keeps us honest about what is automated vs not.

FJFinley J.
Apr 2024

Worth trying if you want something hands-off. We use it alongside manual review. Three months in and still fine with it.

QVQuinn V.
Mar 2025

Worth trying if you want something hands-off. Does the job without a lot of ceremony. Glad we did not overthink the rollout.

MZMorgan Z.
Oct 2025

Aligned with how we already work. Integration was smoother than expected. We might upgrade later — not urgent.

DQDrew Q.
Jan 2024

Clear enough for non-technical folks on the team. It is easy to adjust when priorities shift. Keeps us honest about what is automated vs not.

CSCasey S.
Aug 2024

No surprises so far — that is a good thing. Helpful when the team is stretched thin. We will keep monitoring, but optimistic.

RKRiver K.
Mar 2024

Clear enough for non-technical folks on the team. Documentation is clear enough when we need it. Does not solve everything, but covers the basics.

RWRiver W.
Jul 2025

Clear enough for non-technical folks on the team. Documentation is clear enough when we need it. Exactly the level of detail we wanted.

CGCameron G.
Apr 2024

Does not get in the way of the rest of the team. Handles volume better than we could manually. Three months in and still fine with it.

PRParker R.
Jan 2024

Gets the boring parts off our plate. The handoffs are usually clean. Support has been fine the few times we needed it.

SHSage H.
Jun 2025

Does not get in the way of the rest of the team. Output is consistent enough to trust at a glance. Fine for now.

RLRowan L.
Jul 2024

Good enough for day-to-day use. We use it alongside manual review. Hope this helps someone deciding.

FBFinley B.
Apr 2025

Met our baseline expectations. Good for experiments before we commit deeper. Would try again on a new project.

DQDrew Q.
Jan 2026

Simple to reason about when something changes. We still check the important stuff ourselves. Support has been fine the few times we needed it.

HDHarper D.
Oct 2024

Does what we needed without much fuss. Reporting is basic but usable. Fine for now.

JFJamie F.
Mar 2025

Less back-and-forth than we had before. It is easy to adjust when priorities shift. Exactly the level of detail we wanted.

PMPhoenix M.
Apr 2025

Does not get in the way of the rest of the team. Handles volume better than we could manually. Would recommend for similar use cases.

CSCameron S.
Apr 2026

Clear enough for non-technical folks on the team. Documentation is clear enough when we need it. Three months in and still fine with it.

TKTaylor K.
Nov 2026

Fits our workflow better than we expected. Reasonable default choices most of the time. Glad we did not overthink the rollout.

SNSkyler N.
Jun 2026

Does not get in the way of the rest of the team. Output is consistent enough to trust at a glance. We might upgrade later — not urgent.

RPReese P.
Jan 2025

Helpful for keeping things moving. Good for experiments before we commit deeper. Support has been fine the few times we needed it.

EGEmerson G.
Apr 2024

Nothing flashy, but dependable. The handoffs are usually clean. Better than doing it all by hand.

LLLogan L.
Mar 2024

No surprises so far — that is a good thing. Helpful when the team is stretched thin. Exactly the level of detail we wanted.

MHMorgan H.
Feb 2026

Nothing flashy, but dependable. Turnaround feels predictable. Reasonable for the price point we expect.

EQEden Q.
May 2024

Fits our workflow better than we expected. Helpful when the team is stretched thin. Saved us more time than we thought.

CBCasey B.
Aug 2025

Aligned with how we already work. We still check the important stuff ourselves. Better than doing it all by hand.

JFJamie F.
Nov 2024

Does what we needed without much fuss. We would like more customization eventually. Glad we did not overthink the rollout.

Launch your Prediction Market Trading Desk

Deploy your AI-powered business in minutes. No team required.

Get started