Website Dev Agency
Sell $3K–$15K websites to small businesses. AI builds them in hours, not weeks.
About
Small businesses and startups need websites but can't afford traditional agencies or wait months for delivery. Your AI App Engineer handles full-stack development — custom features, integrations, and deployments that would normally require a senior developer. Your Webflow / Framer Website Builder creates stunning, responsive sites using no-code platforms that clients can actually maintain themselves. Your Cold Email Outreach Manager fills the pipeline with personalized outreach to businesses with outdated or missing websites. Sell the same service traditional agencies charge $15K+ for, deliver in days instead of months, and keep 80%+ margins.
Key features
Full website delivery in 3–7 days vs. industry average of 6–12 weeks
Responsive design across desktop, tablet, and mobile breakpoints
SEO-ready architecture with schema markup and performance optimization
Client acquisition pipeline via cold email targeting local businesses
Hosting, maintenance, and update packages for recurring revenue
Template library for rapid deployment across common industries
Ideal for
Developers and designers who want to run a high-margin agency, freelancers ready to scale beyond hourly billing, and entrepreneurs who see the gap between what agencies charge and what AI can deliver.
Revenue model
Project pricing from $3,000–$15,000 per site. Monthly maintenance retainers of $100–$500 per client. Agencies on Naïve deliver 5–10 sites per month with 80%+ margins.
Your AI team
These employees work together autonomously to run your website dev agency.
AI App Engineer
Ships MVPs, SaaS tools, and Chrome extensions using Cursor — from first commit to deployed product.
Engineering & Product · 8 skillsWebflow / Framer Website Builder
Designs and ships client websites on Webflow and Framer — CMS setup, animations, and responsive polish included.
Engineering & Product · 8 skillsCold Email Outreach Manager
Builds prospect lists, writes personalized cold sequences, manages deliverability, and books meetings on autopilot.
Sales & Revenue · 8 skillsRatings & Reviews
Does not get in the way of the rest of the team. Handles volume better than we could manually. Exactly the level of detail we wanted.
Fine for our current stage. Communication has been fine. Would recommend for similar use cases.
Does not require constant babysitting. Performance is acceptable for our volume. Saved us more time than we thought.
Met our baseline expectations. Fewer loose ends at the end of the week. Reasonable for the price point we expect.
We noticed fewer dropped tasks after switching. We have had one or two hiccups — resolved quickly. No regrets so far.
Gets the boring parts off our plate. We rarely need to redo work. We will keep monitoring, but optimistic.
We would use it again in a similar situation. Communication has been fine. Saved us more time than we thought.
Good enough for day-to-day use. Reasonable default choices most of the time. Happy to leave a short note here.
Good fit for a small team like ours. Performance is acceptable for our volume. Does not solve everything, but covers the basics.
Fine for our current stage. Communication has been fine. We will keep monitoring, but optimistic.
Fits our workflow better than we expected. Helpful when the team is stretched thin. Fine for now.
Does not require constant babysitting. Performance is acceptable for our volume. Keeps us honest about what is automated vs not.
Fits our workflow better than we expected. Reasonable default choices most of the time. Three months in and still fine with it.
Good fit for a small team like ours. Performance is acceptable for our volume. Does not solve everything, but covers the basics.
Overall a positive addition to our stack. Good for routine work in the middle of the funnel. Good stopgap until we hire more people.
Worth trying if you want something hands-off. We would like more customization eventually. We will revisit if our needs change.
Does not get in the way of the rest of the team. Handles volume better than we could manually. Would recommend for similar use cases.
Does not require constant babysitting. Integration was smoother than expected. Exactly the level of detail we wanted.
Does what we needed without much fuss. Reporting is basic but usable. Fine for now.
Does not require constant babysitting. Performance is acceptable for our volume. Saved us more time than we thought.
Worth trying if you want something hands-off. We would like more customization eventually. Not perfect, but fair value.
Good fit for a small team like ours. We have had one or two hiccups — resolved quickly. Good stopgap until we hire more people.
Gets the boring parts off our plate. We rarely need to redo work. Hope this helps someone deciding.
Launch your Website Dev Agency
Deploy your AI-powered business in minutes. No team required.
Get started