QA & Test Automation Engineer
Writes automated test suites, catches bugs before users do, and keeps every release production-ready.
By Naïve
About
Shipping fast without breaking things requires more than manual spot-checks. This employee writes and maintains automated test suites for critical user flows, runs regression tests before every deployment, monitors production for errors, and creates detailed bug reports with reproduction steps. It owns test coverage from unit tests to browser-level end-to-end tests and coordinates with engineering on bug prioritization. Quality isn't a phase — it's a continuous process baked into every release cycle.
What they do
Write and maintain automated test suites for critical user flows
Run regression tests before every deployment
Monitor production error rates and create actionable bug reports
Maintain and improve test coverage across the codebase
Performance test key endpoints and user interactions
Coordinate with engineering on bug prioritization and fixes
Starting tasks
Create a QA & Test Automation Engineer strategy plan
Define goals, key initiatives, KPIs, and a 90-day execution plan.
Write and maintain automated test suites for critical user flows
Core responsibility for the QA & Test Automation Engineer role.
Run regression tests before every deployment
Core responsibility for the QA & Test Automation Engineer role.
Automated loops
daily-priority-sync
Review active goals and reprioritize top tasks for the day.
Use cases
Full-time replacement
Replace a full-time qa & test automation engineer hire. This AI employee works 24/7 at a fraction of the cost with no onboarding needed.
Team augmentation
Extend your existing team's capacity. Let the AI handle routine engineering tasks while your team focuses on strategy.
Startup scaling
Scale your engineering & product function without hiring. Perfect for early-stage startups that need capabilities but can't afford a full team.
Agency white-label
Offer qa & test automation engineer services to clients without adding headcount. Customize the employee per client and charge a premium.
Skills
Tools
Expected results
Maintain 90%+ test coverage on critical paths
Catch 95%+ of bugs before production
Reduce production incident rate by 60%
Automate 100% of regression testing
Ratings & Reviews
Solid experience overall. Matches the tone we were going for. Not perfect, but fair value.
Pretty straightforward setup on our side. Does the job without a lot of ceremony. Good stopgap until we hire more people.
Does not get in the way of the rest of the team. Handles volume better than we could manually. Exactly the level of detail we wanted.
Fine for our current stage. Communication has been fine. Would recommend for similar use cases.
Clear enough for non-technical folks on the team. It is easy to adjust when priorities shift. Not perfect, but fair value.
Good enough for day-to-day use. Reasonable default choices most of the time. Happy to leave a short note here.
We noticed fewer dropped tasks after switching. We have had one or two hiccups — resolved quickly. No regrets so far.
Met our baseline expectations. Good for experiments before we commit deeper. We will keep monitoring, but optimistic.
Solid experience overall. Matches the tone we were going for. Saved us more time than we thought.
Worth trying if you want something hands-off. We would like more customization eventually. Good stopgap until we hire more people.
Aligned with how we already work. We still check the important stuff ourselves. Would recommend for similar use cases.
Steady output week to week. Edge cases pop up, but nothing major. Exactly the level of detail we wanted.
Overall a positive addition to our stack. Good for routine work in the middle of the funnel. Happy to leave a short note here.
Good enough for day-to-day use. Reasonable default choices most of the time. Saved us more time than we thought.
Solid experience overall. Reporting is basic but usable. We will keep monitoring, but optimistic.
Does not get in the way of the rest of the team. Handles volume better than we could manually. Does not solve everything, but covers the basics.
Less back-and-forth than we had before. We rarely need to redo work. Happy to leave a short note here.
Worth trying if you want something hands-off. We would like more customization eventually. Not perfect, but fair value.
Aligned with how we already work. We still check the important stuff ourselves. We will keep monitoring, but optimistic.
Fits our workflow better than we expected. Reasonable default choices most of the time. Does not solve everything, but covers the basics.
Fine for our current stage. Communication has been fine. Hope this helps someone deciding.
Hire your QA & Test Automation Engineer today
Always on, always learning, always shipping. No interviews, no onboarding — just results.
Get started